Substandard Patient Care

SUBSTANDARD QUALITY OF CARESUBSTANDARD QUALITY OF CAREIntroductionSubstandard fibre of health tending is duly recognized as a major name of medical crises with potential to jeopardize the functioning and purpose of the American health grapple system . Whereas on the one overtake medical costs of treatment are rising , on the other malpractices and non compliance on the come apart of medical professionals and institutions compounds the caper and seriously questions the attribute of health perplexity be provided to citizensHowever , in advance proceeding further it s important to downhearted the stairsstand what is br barely meant by the substandard quality of care . The substandard quality of care implies that one or more than than of the exigencys mandatory under the federal regulations 42 CFR 483 .13 involving re sident behavior and facility practices , 42CFR .15 involving quality of life or 42CFR 483 .25 regarding quality of care are non complied with leading to actual jeopardy to the resident health or safety or having potential for causing more than marginal harm (HealthCare information , 2007 . Any nursing foundation found with delivering substandard quality of healthcare or carrying world-shattering deficiencies in its healthcare treatment plans would be inevitable to straightway insure the issueA fibre of substandard health careThe following case presents an practice of injuries from utilization control healthcare delivered resulting in horrible and eternal injuries to the patient (Flannery , 2007The case presented here is about Lois Wickline who was diagnosed with Leriche s syndrome , which is a vascular occlusion . Upon diagnosis , her doctor recommended surgery where a part of an artery was to be re backsided with a polytetrafluoroethylene graft . The architectural pl an providing medical care to Ms . Wickline w! as California s medical attention program , Medi-Cal that was responsible for commanding costs and authorizing treatment .

As such the approval and ascendence from state was a requirement to perform surgeryWhen Ms , Wickline s doctors sought- afterward(a) approval from Medi-Cal for the surgery , Medi-Cal concur and also completelyowed ten eld of post-surgery treatment in hospital . However , Ms . Wickline s retrieval did not take place as estimated and a solar day before due remove date , the sawbones and his helper felt that Ms . Wickline required supernumerary octette long time of recuperation in hospital . Medi-Cal was again approached for the approval for this encompassin g stay , butt on this occasion Medi-Cal differed from surgeon s recommendations for eight days extension . The Medi-Cal typical , who was himself a certified surgeon , merely consulted a Medi-Cal reserve on phone , and after evaluating progress of Ms . Wickline on basis of her temperature , diet and bowel function , declined the request and authorise only four day extension . In the subroutine he neither reviewed all documents related to the case nor consulted any other vascular-surgery specialist (Flannery , 2007On refutation by Med-Cal , the surgeon go to the case of Ms . Wickline unyielding not to push for the additional days of care and complied with Med-Cal directives by discharging her at the end of the stipulated pointedness . Both the surgeon and the benefactor admitted in their testimonial that they did not push for the...If you want to let a full essay, secern it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to ge t a full information about our service, visit our pag! e: How it works.