This article concerns the more explicit nature of external employment, that of illegal substances: in this case, obsolescent animal meat. The pangolin, an endangered animal registered with the International Union for the saving of Nature, was caught and slaughtered in Southeast Asian countries and then transported to mainland China, a region whose culture considers pangolin meat a delicacy. The pangolin rat no longer be found in China; therefore, it must be imported from other countries. This illegal trade is getting the international attention that it merits which should help the pangolin cause. Concerning international trade in general, I think that is astounding that the Chinese government is pieceing on this issue. Considering that it is the Chinese citizens who are today asking for this product, it is quite a wonder that the government is acting against them. This says a great deal about how governments will act when there is international pressure.
Had the Chinese government condoned this act, there would crap been international pressure from such highly Powers as the U.S.A, France, and the U.K. who throw started to take wildlife very seriously and on a planetary scale. The case of the pangolin is a prime example of how countries governments will act in accordance with global rules. Were the Chinese to ply the continued import of this illegal meat (which is arriving into the country in large quantities according to the article), they would face international condemnation from the Super Powers, affecting other areas of international trade including manufactured goods and food.If you fate to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment