Marx & Nietzsche

Marx and NietzscheIn these paragraphs Marx takes into consideration the first `illusion of German Ideology and questions it rigour . German philosophy based its premises about benevolent being consciousness on idealism whereas Marx develops it from the material existence of human beings . He says that `[t]he premises from which we begin ar not peremptory ones , not dogmas , but real premises (Marx ,. 311 , these premises are based on the real individuals , their activity and the material conditions on a lower floor which they live (p . 311 ) whereas German premises does not contrastate from human existence but is a production of handstal consummation . Marxian method is historical materialism but it does not miserly that it is not based on premises but strange German premises , it is based on real look . So Marx says `In direct contrast to German philosophy which descends from heaven to earth , here we ascend from earth to heaven . That is to say , we do not set out from what men say , imagine , conceive , nor from men as narrated , persuasion of , imagined , conceived , in to arrive at men in the phase . We set out from real , active men , and on the basis of their real vivification-process we demonstrate the development of the ideological reflexes and echoes of this life-process (Marx ,. 315Marx is of the vision that primarily human beings are productive as they essential develop a system of production to comply with their sum of subsistence and only hence they can satisfy their material need . This necessity generates a chain reaction i .e . juvenile needs and new production And these productive forces and processes develop the accessible existence of human being . So it is the material life that determines the tender life of humans . So materialism directs the social and hence the human consciousness .

Consciousness is , therefore , from the genuinely beginning a social product , and remains so as long as men exist at all (Marx ,br 317According to Nietzsche , classical calamity was evolved from the traditional chorus that was in advance(p) and original drama evolved from Greek ritualism .---Nietzsche refutes Aristotelian scheme pertaining to origin of Greek tragedy and rests his premises on the theory of Schiller Schiller theory is of the view that chorus is a living wall that has enveloped the Greek tragedy in to detach itself from the real world and its realities . And hence it has retained its poetic autonomy and saved itself from naturalism The lech , as the dionysian chorist lives in a religiously acknowledge reality under the sanction of myth and cult (Nietzsche ,. 322 ) emit , an epitome of myth and cult of religions becomes the basic of Greek Tragedy in opposition to naturalism prevailing in the coeval intellectual world . The tragedy chorus replicates this natural feature in an artistic wayNietzsche illustrates that tragedy as an art trope is valuable for humanity . In contrast to Schopenhauer , Nietzsche demonstrates that tragedy as the art form of corporeal recognition and approval of shame and miseries of life and exulting in these harsh realities adoration...If you want to sting a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .